Argentina demands VAR review after controversial dismissal
Argentina saw the VAR cause a historic red card for Breel Embolo in the quarter‑final against Switzerland (72' 1‑1), and the IFAB admitted the mistake in a circular released on July 28 2026. Argentina won 3‑1 after extra time, but the controversy fuels the debate over arbitration fairness.
What did the IFAB reveal about the incident?
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) issued circular 34, stating the VAR may only correct player identification, not the foul itself. In Embolo's case, referee Joao Pinheiro showed a second yellow for simulation, but the VAR nullified the first card and applied the dismissal, breaching protocol.
Why does this matter for Argentina?
The error not only impacted Embolo; it raised doubts about VAR's ability to protect Argentina from mistaken calls. After a recent loss to Spain (1‑0 on 2026‑07‑19) and a recent form of 4 wins‑0 draws‑1 loss (LWWWW), any controversy can affect team confidence heading into future tournaments, including the 2026 World Cup.
What changes does the IFAB propose?
In circular 32, the IFAB listed rare situations that could be reviewed, such as red cards stemming from an incorrectly shown second yellow. It also announced a ten‑year review of VAR to seek improvements in efficiency and fairness, potentially benefiting Argentina in upcoming stages.
What’s the next step for Argentina?
Head coach Lionel Scaloni’s staff has asked FIFA for a case review and clearer protocols. Meanwhile, the squad prepares for its next friendly, aiming to fine‑tune play after the controversy and keep the winning streak that positions them as group favorites.
